Tags:
Replies to This Discussion
Of course, my game is identical to Ivan Lendl's!
No. I don't think I do. I have a very particular style of play - it actually matches my poker style too. In poker it is called "tight aggressive" which means that you play tight, mostly good hands - not much bluffing, but when you get the big hands, you bet big and/or try to trap people. A "loose" poker player plays a wide range of hands (good ones and bad ones) and bluff more.
In tennis, I'm somewhat defensive, but when I have my opportunity, I go for it.
I think the closest player on the tour is Murray. And yes, I'm a fan of his, but I have never modeled my game on his... Maybe I should. I could learn a drop shot.
Federer. I actually became a fan of his after I 1st started playing and decided I didn't like my primarily slice bh. I started playing in 2002 and after I decided that I loved the game the plan was to turn me into a player like the 2003 US Open Champion Roddick, with the big serve and sledgehammer forehand. The only problem was my one hand bh. A teacher hearing my disappointment told me to "watch Federer" and that's wheere the fandom and emulation began and continues to this day. The only problem is when I start to try the mindbending shots like Fed. After one or two go in the I think I own the shot and I give away a set with unforced errors!
Also I can't serve like Fed I can mime the ball bouce and toss but I can't keep that deep of a backbend or my back foot on the ground I serve from a more vertical plateau.
I think Kuerten, Edberg, Gasquet, Laver on the one hander. Fed's backhand isn't as good as theirs.
Sampras on the serve for sure.
CoachV - William Vazquez said:
Federer and Nadal. is there anyone else that's important?
I think Kuerten, Edberg, Gasquet, Laver on the one hander. Fed's backhand isn't as good as theirs.
Sampras on the serve for sure.
CoachV - William Vazquez said:Federer and Nadal. is there anyone else that's important?
© 2024 Created by Mark / The Mayor. Powered by