Tags:
Replies to This Discussion
I hear what you are saying John and could not agree more. I think we have something special here - a place online where true tennis fans can come to share ideas and debate, but that doesn't devolve into childish namecalling like on the rest of the tennis forums out there.
I have not seen but one thread where people were getting at each other. I think this is cool if it is all in good fun.
It's okay here, John. But I do know I cannot train like I want to given my life situation. I do not know if I am headed to Thailand in two weeks time or not.
I don't have anything against tournament playing. I see myself still experimenting with different styles. Also, I am nearing the point where I feel I can do them all under pressure. I wonder if tournament playing is what I secretly relish.
But I am happy with my game, even if I never step on the court against those who made it their entire lifestyle. But I do understand why one would. It's the best game in the world.
I don't mind real criticism, as long as it is based on first hand observations. But to talk about numbers as being the end all is absurd to me. People are real, games are real, numbers are abstraction.
Wow, you are a tough grader, Wettengel would have to be a 6.5 and Weston gets the better of him now and then, Brogan has pretty impressive Open record, three sets with Edlefsen who played circuit recently. I still use most of this matrix for higher level ratings. I'm talking singles play for ratings discussion.
http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20Play...
© 2024 Created by Mark / The Mayor. Powered by